Extension and critique: A response to Robert Young
In response to Robert Young's critical comments concerning Hermeneutics and Education I clarify two issues. First, I suggest that a more detailed account of interpretation and learning could be developed in a hermeneutically informed cognitive psychology. This would be an account that escapes the textual model of silent reading construed as private mental experience, and that acknowledges the social and communicative dimensions of understanding. Second, in contrast to Young's view, I contend that phronesis is not reducible to a set of inner thought processes and that it has a role to play even in a critical social theory of education. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Gallagher, S. (1996). Extension and critique: A response to Robert Young. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 15 (4), 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368489