Electronic Theses and Dissertations

John Torrey

Date

2019

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

Department

Philosophy

Committee Chair

Remy Debes

Committee Member

Luvell Anderson

Committee Member

Thomas Nenon

Committee Member

Deborah Tollefsen

Abstract

Within academic circles, arguments supporting the rectification of anti-Black injustice in America have become more widespread in recent years. Three questions arise from these arguments: How should we understand what it means to rectify those injustices? What explains why these arguments, despite the increased attention by scholars, have not been taken seriously in mainstream American social and political discussions? Finally, what can be done to change this lack of mainstream attention? My dissertation answers these questions by advancing a new moral framework for understanding what it means to rectify anti-black injustice. On this view, rectificatory justice requires possessing a moral right to rectification, a right that Black Americans would have if moral rights possession was based solely on making morally justified demands. Possessing and ultimately exercising moral rights requires more than having moral justification it requires being socially recognized in a certain sort of way, such that morally justified demands become a social reality. Correspondingly, even though Black Americans are making morally justified demands, they do not yet possess a moral right to rectification because of how they are socially recognized. This constrains the social and political potential of arguments supporting rectificatory measures, like reparations. Some have argued that Black Americans have already gained rectificatory justice through anti-discrimination legislation and programs like affirmative action. Although they appear to be rectificatory, they do not meet the standards of rectificatory justice because they do not take responsibility for creating the conditions of injustice, preferring to focus on preventing future versions of similar forms of injustice. Since Black Americans have not received rectificatory justice but are making morally justified demands, what is required for them to possess a right to rectification is a change in how they are socially recognized. By amending the cultural narrative regarding anti-Black injustice as an enduring phenomenon rather than a historic one, and endeavoring to produce a sense of justice within mainstream America regarding anti-Black injustice, it may be possible to change how Black Americans are socially recognized such that they possess a right to rectification.

Comments

Data is provided by the student.

Library Comment

Dissertation or thesis originally submitted to ProQuest

Notes

Open Access

Download

Share

COinS