Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Date
2025
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science
Department
Psychology
Committee Chair
Shelbi Kuhlmann
Committee Member
Gina Caucci
Committee Member
Nicholas Simon
Abstract
Cognitive Load Theory has recently been revised to exclude germane load as a distinct construct, prompting a re-evaluation of intrinsic and extraneous load measures. This study tested the psychometric validity and predictive utility of a two-factor cognitive load model during algebra problem-solving with worked examples or independent practice. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses supported the structural validity of two established instruments (Leppink et al., 2013; Krieglstein et al., 2023) when germane load items were removed. Regression analyses indicated no significant differences in cognitive load or learning outcomes between instructional groups. However, pre-test performance strongly predicted post-test scores, and intrinsic and extraneous load scores approached significance as predictors. These results provide empirical support for the revised two-factor model and underscore its relevance to instructional design. Findings also highlight the importance of prior knowledge in moderating the effectiveness of worked examples.
Library Comment
Dissertation or thesis originally submitted to ProQuest.
Notes
Open Access
Recommended Citation
Patterson, Camden Noelle, "Rethinking Cognitive Load: Validating a Two-Factor Framework of Cognitive Load Across Problem-Solving Formats with Differing Levels of Guidance" (2025). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3837.
https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/3837
Comments
Data is provided by the student.