Electronic Theses and Dissertations Archive
Date
2026
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
Department
English
Committee Chair
William Duffy
Committee Member
Chloe Robertson
Committee Member
Elliott Casal
Committee Member
Katherine Fredlund
Abstract
This dissertation examines the impacts of the use of plagiarism and AI detection software as surveillance methods in online writing classes. Participants in this study were asked a series of questions via questionnaire regarding their attitudes, perceptions, and experiences with plagiarism and AI detection software. Participant responses indicate that plagiarism and AI detection in online writing classes causes anxiety and fear, which degrades their relationship with the instructor and fundamentally alters their writing process and the writing they produce. Participant responses noted that they fear that plagiarism and AI detectors will falsely flag their writing as plagiarized or AI-generated. Participants also indicated feeling anxious about the notion of their writing being surveilled, archived, and sold by for-profit companies. Operating under a series of guiding principles that prioritize trusting student-teacher relationships and critical digital literacy and pedagogy, this dissertation argues that online writing classes should remain a space for free thought, expression, and learning, and resistance against EdTech surveillance – by institutions, instructors, and students – is the only way forward.
Library Comment
Dissertation or thesis originally submitted to ProQuest/Clarivate.
Notes
Open Access.
Recommended Citation
Gillo, Emily, "Writing to the Panopticon: Surveillance, Plagiarism Detection, and Student Anxiety in Online Writing Classes" (2026). Electronic Theses and Dissertations Archive. 3969.
https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/3969
Archival Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
Comments
Data is provided by the student.