Electronic Theses and Dissertations Archive
Date
2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Department
History
Committee Chair
Bradley Dixon
Committee Member
Bradley Dixon
Committee Member
Christine Eisel
Committee Member
Cristina Woolner
Abstract
Abstract In colonial Virginia and Maryland, indentured servants were the primary engine of the colony's economy. In theory, the temporary exchange of labor for passage and potential social mobility offered women and men a similar opportunity to rise above their original station. However, the historical research of the past few decades has revealed that women had a distinctly different experience with the law than men. This thesis will argue that colonial law defined a particular and punitive form of servitude for white indentured women, viewing them as reproductive liabilities rather than as purely in economic assets. While The author has examined Virginia and Maryland Statutes, County Court Petitions, and Runaway Ads from 1650 to 1770 to determine how colonial law sought to monetize women's biology by fining their ability to bear children. Male servants were primarily monitored for their labor output; women, however, were subjected to surveillance that monitored both their labor in a tobacco economy, and their ability to reproduce human life. The thesis examines the legal means by which the state regulated women's bodies and, in particular, the Bastardy Laws that extended the length of service for women who became pregnant during their contracts. These laws effectively converted pregnancy and childbirth into a debt owed by an indentured woman in the form of additional years of service.
Library Comment
Dissertation or thesis originally submitted to ProQuest/Clarivate.
Notes
Open Access
Recommended Citation
Corbitt, Jennifer Daniel, "Female Indentured Servants and the Law in the Colonial Chesapeake" (2026). Electronic Theses and Dissertations Archive. 4015.
https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/4015
Archival Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
Comments
Data is provided by the student.”