Continuous versus interrupted schedules of thermal biofeedback: An exploratory analysis with clinical subjects

Authors

• Frank Andrasik, State University of New York Albany
• Thomas P. Pallmeyer, State University of New York Albany
• Edward B. Blanchard, State University of New York Albany
• Virginia Attanasio, State University of New York Albany

Abstract

Researchers administer thermal biofeedback in several different formats, although the most common are continuous administration and a series of brief trials separated by frequent rest breaks. The present study directly compared these two administration schedules with individuals suffering from migraine headache. Optimal training effects occurred for the continuous schedule of administration. Surprisingly, the interrupted schedule actually led to decreases in hand temperature over eight sessions. Possible reasons for this finding and its implications are discussed. © 1984 Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Publication Title

Biofeedback and Self Regulation

Recommended Citation

Andrasik, F., Pallmeyer, T., Blanchard, E., & Attanasio, V. (1984). Continuous versus interrupted schedules of thermal biofeedback: An exploratory analysis with clinical subjects. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 9 (3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998973