Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions
Abstract
A weight vector representing the relative importance of various characteristics of ground motions (GMs) and a conditioning intensity measure (IM) are required to be able to use the generalized conditional IM framework for the purpose of GM selection. An inappropriate weight vector may result in the biased distributions of some important characteristics of GMs and, consequently, the bias in the structural responses. This article aims to provide the analyst with the understanding of which properties of GMs are important in capturing the accurate structural responses, to specifically assign a suitable weight to them and to select an appropriate conditioning IM as well. To this end, 4 reinforced concrete buildings, located at the site in which the seismic hazard is dominated by shallow crustal earthquakes, are considered. The findings reveal that the appropriate weight vectors depend on the characteristics of the employed structural systems. In addition, the role played by each IM in capturing the true structural responses changes over different earthquake intensity levels implying that different weight vectors are required over different earthquake levels. Furthermore, this study shows that, even in case of shorter-duration GMs from shallow events, GM duration should be incorporated in GM selection as it has effects on the peak-based structural responses in the earthquake levels beyond the level of 2%-in-50-years. Specifically, the findings reveal that in case of shallow events, unlike large magnitude earthquakes, the shorter the duration of GM the more rapid release of energy and, consequently, the larger the peak-based structural responses.
Publication Title
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
Recommended Citation
Kiani, J., & Pezeshk, S. (2017). Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46 (15), 2739-2755. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2928