Comparison of compensation and capitalization models when treating suicidality in young adults
Abstract
The current study examined compensation and capitalization treatment models with specific reference to problem-solving appraisal and problem-solving treatment of suicidal behavior (M. D. Rudd, T. Joiner, & M. H. Rajab, 2000). A sample of 98 young adults (mean age = 22), who had recently attempted suicide or ideated about suicide to the degree that they came to clinical attention, were randomly assigned to either problem-solving or control treatment. Participants with poorer problem-solving appraisal at baseline responded better than did participants with greater problem-solving appraisal to problem-solving treatment at 6-month follow-up, as would be predicted by the compensation model. Results suggest that treatment of suicidality for individuals with problem-solving skill deficits may be most effective by targeting these deficits rather than capitalizing on strengths. Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association.
Publication Title
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Recommended Citation
Wingate, L., Van Orden, K., Joiner, T., Williams, F., & Rudd, M. (2005). Comparison of compensation and capitalization models when treating suicidality in young adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73 (4), 756-762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.756