Global warming as a socioscientific controversy
Abstract
Socioscientific controversies are "extended argumentative engagements over socially significant issues . . . comprising communicative events and practices in and from both scientific and nonscientific spheres" (Stewart, 2009, p. 125). While global warming is not controversial among the vast majority of climate scientists, socioscientific controversies over global warming abound in various media, as citizens, politicians, journalists, and others discuss and weigh the scientific evidence for and appropriate policy responses to global warming. In this chapter, the authors investigate the lexical choices used in the New York Times in straight news articles reporting on controversies about global warming from 2001-2006, as partisan differences on this issue became more pronounced. Specifically, using DICTION 5.0, the authors analyze 87 news reports, comparing those focused on science issues with those focused on policy issues. These statistical lexical comparisons are supplemented with qualitative discourse analyses.
Publication Title
Agri-Food Supply Chain Management: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice
Recommended Citation
Stewart, C., & Rhodes, C. (2016). Global warming as a socioscientific controversy. Agri-Food Supply Chain Management: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1629-3.ch001
