•  
  •  
 
University of Memphis Law Review

Abstract

The Biden Administration, in its first few days in office, clearly stated its intention of using the public procurement system to achieve goals such as favoring domestic companies and workers, ensuring a sustainable public health supply chain, protecting the federal workforce, advancing racial equity, and replacing the federal government’s fleet of vehicles with electric vehicles. The use of public procurement systems in this manner is not new. In fact, it has become commonplace for incoming administrations at different levels of government both in the United States and abroad to announce broad policy objectives when entering office. While there is wide consensus that it is possible to leverage procurement systems to achieve societal goals beyond the purchase of the good or service itself, the reliance on the system to provide such far-ranging solutions coupled with the mixed evidence on the effectiveness of some policies raises concerns over whether the procurement system can achieve its primary goal of efficiency in procurement while simultaneously meeting societal goals. In this Article, we advocate for increased rigor in the assessment of costs and benefits derived from the application of socioeconomic policies in public procurement and for changes in the governance structure that would place the burden of justifying use of the procurement system on the agencies in charge of the specific policy. In this scenario, the procurement officer would remain the ultimate decision-maker regarding a specific procurement, but now equipped with better information, would be able to make better decisions. To this end, we provide a taxonomy of socioeconomic procurement policies that are used in the United States and in other countries and review evidence of the effectiveness of different mechanisms used. We develop and provide a conceptual framework on how to review socioeconomic policies coherently while respecting the efficiency goal of the procurement system.

Share

COinS
 

Archival Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.