•  
  •  
 
University of Memphis Law Review

Abstract

Antitrust laws in the United States are at the center of a heated debate. Some scholars argue that antitrust should focus on price and output competition in a single market, with consumer welfare maximi-zation as the criterion for intervention. An emerging opposition, often categorized as the “neo-Brandeisian school,” argues that the original calling of antitrust was to restrain the political influence of corporate “bigness.” The latter criticize consumer-welfare antitrust for failing to capture the influence of concentrated economy-wide power held by individuals and corporations through their holdings in several mar-kets—the most notable examples being multi-market digital platforms such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Apple. Shifts in the political arena may have given this moment an influential position in the shap-ing of current U.S. antitrust regulation. The COVID-19 pandemic is aggravating the problems faced by regulators as small businesses collapse, dominant conglomerates grow stronger, and social-distancing measures diminish the ability of the public to keep governments in check. The tools available to curb ex-cessive economic power include merger control and breaking up large monopolies. While the antitrust toolbox is (mostly) equipped to dis-mantle concentrated economy-wide entities with potentially detri-mental political influence over policymakers, identifying such entities is beyond the capabilities of antitrust laws. Existing literature offers no comprehensive methodology for identifying the kind of economic “bigness” that threatens not only com-petition but also the integrity of political systems. The quest for such a methodology is crucial because without it, any intervention in the mar-ket will be timid, overly cautious, and probably delegitimized by these entities. This Article documents the incremental emergence of an Is-raeli methodology for identifying economy-wide power with excessive influence on policymakers. Building on this experience, in itself an ex-periment based on U.S. scholarship, this Article proposes a pillar for a universal methodology for identifying the accumulation of influence by economic entities, as a first step to curb the kind of economic “big-ness” that endangers democracy.

Share

COinS
 

Archival Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.