Abstract
This paper is the first step in developing a neo-classical theory of the military officer corps as a functionalist profession. It unpacks the central paradox of Samuel P. Huntington’s The Soldier and the State: Why does an account that begins with a call for a highly professionalized officer corps to obey the orders of any legally legitimate civilian regime end with the promise that humanity can achieve both security and redemption if all the nations of the world adopt core military values? How can “militarize the military,” Huntington’s solution to the classical question of civilian/military relations—Plato’s “Who guards the guardians?”—come to mean “militarize the civilian”? The answer is that military values, seen as a proper subset of functionalist professional values, come to the same as the values of classical republicanism: The fullest and widest possible development of all forms of human excellence or, in a more modern phrase, no child left behind.
Recommended Citation
Atkinson, Rob
(2023)
"Military Officers as Neo-Classical
Professionals: Guardians of the
Republic, Not Merely Servants of the
Regime,"
University of Memphis Law Review: Vol. 53:
Iss.
3, Article 1.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/um-law-review/vol53/iss3/1
Archival Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.