•  
  •  
 
University of Memphis Law Review

Abstract

In the presence of significant environmental impacts, the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) requires agencies to take a hard look at community effects. However, analysis of human impacts under NEPA is generally cursory. While executive orders requiring consideration of environmental justice have raised awareness of community impacts in some instances, agency approach is inconsistent, and courts largely view such analysis as a box to be checked. Such cursory consideration of human impacts leaves historically underserved communities in a legal blind spot that perpetuates environmental and procedural inequity. Using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ management of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River Basin as a case study, this Article argues that NEPA regulations and practices must be revised to standardize rigorous agency consideration of community and environmental justice impacts.

Share

COinS
 

Archival Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. This material is part of a digital archival collection and is not utilized for current University instruction, programs, or active public communication. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.