Identifier
128
Date
2018
Document Type
Honors Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Major
Psychology
Concentration
Cognitive Science
Committee Member
Stephanie Huette
Abstract
The current study investigated potential shifts in opinion due to modal verbs used in politically-sided newspaper articles on climate change. The political ideology (conservative or progressive) of the participants was measured as a way to explore opinion changes. Memory was also tested as it could have been an indicator for a major covariance for the study - bias and prior knowledge. College students (N = 85) took an ideology pretest and posttest, read articles manipulated to contain either should or must, and answered memory questions. Overall, results showed there was no significant change in opinion, with most participants responding as progressive. As for memory, there was a slight yet significant negative correlation between the strength of conservative response and memory; the more conservative they participant was the less likely he or she was to correctly remember information. The inconclusive and unexpected results are discussed, and possible explanations are considered.
Library Comment
Honors thesis originally submitted to the Local University of Memphis Honor’s Thesis Repository.
Notes
Data is provided by the student.
Recommended Citation
Taylor, Janie Nina-Anna-Manning, "Modality Makes Headlines: How Political Newspapers Talk About Climate Change" (2018). Honors Theses. 80.
https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/honors_theses/80
Comments
Undergraduate Honor's Thesis